Του Παντελή Παντελόγλου – For Enlgish version click here
Κατά την πρόσφατη επίσκεψή του στις ΗΠΑ, ο Νικόλαος Δένδιας μίλησε στο John Jay College of Criminal Justice του City University of New York. Ο ίδιος ο υπουργός δήλωσε στο ΑΠΕ για την ομιλία του: «Είχα την ευκαιρία να αναπτύξω ένα θέμα που έχει να κάνει με τα ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα και την εφαρμογή του νόμου και επίσης να αναλύσω τις τεράστιες προκλήσεις που αντιμετωπίζει σήμερα η ελληνική κοινωνία». Πράγματι ο υπουργός μίλησε για το κράτος δικαίου, την αρχή της αναλογικότητας, τον Αριστοτέλη, τον Πλάτωνα και άλλα, προτού φτάσει στην δικαιολόγηση της πολιτικής που ακολουθεί στο υπουργείο του. Ωστόσο, μεγάλο μέρος του θεωρητικού μέρους της ομιλίας που ο ίδιος ο υπουργός έδωσε στη δημοσιότητα μέσω της ιστοσελίδας του υπουργείου Δημόσιας Τάξης και Προστασίας του Πολίτη, όπως και της προσωπικής του ιστοσελίδας, αποδεικνύεται πως είναι προϊόν αντιγραφής από αντίστοιχα λήμματα της αγγλικής Wikipedia και όχι μόνο. Η αντιγραφή αυτή δεν έχει γίνει χωρίς λάθη σε όλες τις περιπτώσεις. Ιδού μια ενδεικτική αντιπαραβολή:
Υπόμνημα
__ Πλήρως αντιγραμμένο
__ Όλες οι πληροφορίες με άλλη σειρά
__ Λάθος στην αντιγραφή
Ομιλία Δένδια, μέρος 3ο | Wikipedia, λήμμα Rule of law |
The rule of law is the “supremacy of regular power as opposed to arbitrary power”. The phrase can be traced back to the 17th century, and it was popularized in the 19th century by British jurist A. V. Dicey. Even earlier the phrase “Not under man but God and Law” was attributed to the British jurist Henry of Bracton while the concept was familiar to ancient philosophers as well. |
In its general sense, the phrase can be traced back to the 16th century, and it was popularized in the 19th century by British jurist A. V. Dicey. The concept was familiar to ancient philosophers such as Aristotle, who wrote “Law should govern”.[4] Rule of law implies that every citizen is subject to the law. It stands in contrast to the idea that the ruler is above the law, for example by divine right. Και παρακάτω: Και στις σημειώσεις: |
Schematically man can say that the rule of law is a system in which the following four universal principles are upheld: |
As used by the World Justice Project, a non-profit organization committed to advancing the rule of law around the world, the rule of law refers to a rules-based system in which the following four universal principles are upheld:[56] |
Nowadays it is safe to say that the rule of law ultimately comes down to a principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities—including the State itself—are accountable to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated—and which are consistent with international human rights norms and standards. |
The Secretary-General of the United Nations defines the rule of law as:[47] |
Ομιλία Δένδια 5ο μέρος | Wikipedia, λήμμα Proportionality |
In European Union law there are generally acknowledged to be four stages to a proportionality test, namely: there must be a legitimate aim for a measure or restriction |
In European Union law there generally acknowledged to be four stages to a proportionality test, namely,[3]
|
Ομιλία Δένδια 5ο μέρος | Wikipedia, λήμμα Hamdan v. Rumsfeld |
In Hamdan v. Rumsfeld case (2006), the US Supreme Court held that military commissions set up by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay lacked “the power to proceed because its structures and procedures violate both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949.” Specifically, the ruling said that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions which requires fair trials for prisoners was applicable in such situation and thus violated. | Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that military commissions set up by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay lack “the power to proceed because its structures and procedures violate both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949.”[1]Specifically, the ruling says that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions was violated. |
Two years earlier in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld case the Court had recognized the power of the government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority. |
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of thegovernment to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority. |
Ομιλία Δένδια 6ο μέρος | Wikipedia, λήμμα European union |
It took us decades of hard negotiations to move forward from the European Community of Coal and Steel (1952) to the European Economic Community (1957) and from it to the European Union (1992). The latter constitutes today an economic and political union of 27 member states encompassing a population of more than 500 million habitants and ranking No 1 in the list of countries by Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in total (Per capita ranks No 15). |
The EU traces its origins from the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) and the European Economic Community (EEC), formed by the Inner Six countries in 1951 and 1958 respectively. Και παρακάτω: |
Ομιλία Δένδια 6ο μέρος | Ιστοσελίδα Citizenhouse.eu |
Fundamental rights established by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950) and other international legal instruments ratified by the Members States, as well as those deriving from the constitutional traditions common to them, form part of the general principles of law that are enforceable by the Court of Justice of the European Union. Moreover the Treaty of Lisbon (2007) brought substantial amendments to the field of human rights environment by giving them a legally binding status, making them part of primary law and providing EU citizens with an additional layer of protection: The revised Charter of Fundamental Rights originally proclaimed in Nice (2000) is the most updated and comprehensive legal instrument of human rights in the world. It contains fifty “rights, freedoms and principles”, stretching from civil and political rights on the one hand to economic, social and cultural rights on the other. Being part of the primary law, the Charter prevails over national law of Member States, when they are acting within the scope of EU law (Article 51). After the adoption of the Treaty of Lisbon, it became directly enforceable by the EU and national courts (Article 51(1)). |
It is important to keep in mind that fundamental rights established by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and other international legal instruments ratified by the Members States, as well as those deriving from the constitutional traditions common to them, form part of the general principles of law that are enforceable by the Court of Justice of the European Union. Και παρακάτω: |
Ομιλία Δένδια 7ο μέρος | Wikipedia, λήμμα Prum Convention |
Especially the Prüm Convention, also known as Schengen III Agreement (2005) has been criticized as the ‘eye of Big Brother over Europe’. The Treaty provides the exchange of data regarding DNA, fingerprints and vehicle registration of concerned persons and cooperation against terrorism. It also contains provisions for the deployment of armed sky marshals on flights between signatory states, joint police patrols, entry of (armed) police forces into the territory of another state for the prevention of immediate danger (hot pursuit), and cooperation in case of mass events or disasters. |
The Prüm Convention (sometimes known as Schengen III Agreement[1]) is a treaty which was signed on 27 May 2005 by Austria,Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Spain in the town of Prüm in Germany. The convention was joined later by other members of the Schengen Agreement. Παρακάτω: |
Κρίμα που ο επιμελής υπουργός δεν αντέγραψε κι άλλη μια φράση από το λήμμα της Wikipedia για το κράτος δικαίου: «Παρά την ευρεία χρήση της από πολιτικούς, δικαστές και πανεπιστημιακούς, το κράτος δικαίου έχει περιγραφεί ως ‘μια εξαιρετικά απατηλή έννοια’ που προκαλεί ‘μια ανεξέλεγκτη απόκλιση κατανοήσεων … όλοι το υποστηρίζουν αλλά έχουν συγκρουόμενες αντιλήψεις για το τι είναι’».π
Σημείωση: η αντιγραφή αποσπασμάτων απο την Wikipedia δεν απαγορεύεται αλλά η χρήση των κειμένων πρέπει να γίνεται με αναφορά πηγής. Το συγκεκριμένο ρεπορτάζ δεν επικεντρώνεται ωστόσο στην λογοκλοπη υπό το πρισμα της πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας αλλά στην προσπάθεια παρουσίασης ιδεολογικού πλαισίου με ξένα κόλλυβα.